Read vs Listen: Hamnet

While Shakespeare is elsewhere, unnamed and rarely on the page as himself, his household lives through a marriage, a death, and the plague that caused it, told across two timelines at once.

Confidence 84%, which puts it in the clear band. Bands run from close call at 50 to 64, through leaning at 65 to 79 and clear at 80 to 94, up to clear cut at 95 and above.

What this book actually is

Hamnet is Maggie O'Farrell's 2020 novel, published in the UK by Tinder Press and running to 384 pages in hardback. It imagines the life of Agnes, wife of an unnamed young Latin tutor who becomes Shakespeare, and the death of their son Hamnet from plague in 1596. The book won the Women's Prize for Fiction, the National Book Critics Circle Award and Waterstones Book of the Year, and has since been adapted for the stage by the Royal Shakespeare Company and, in 2025 and 2026, for the screen by director Chloe Zhao, starring Jessie Buckley and Paul Mescal, with Buckley winning the Academy Award for Best Actress for the role.

Structurally, the novel runs two timelines side by side, one covering the courtship and early marriage of Agnes and her husband roughly fifteen years earlier, the other covering 1596, when Hamnet and his twin sister Judith fall ill. The chapters interleave chronologically distinct strands throughout, and a widely discussed standalone chapter breaks from both entirely to trace, in forensic detail, exactly how the plague reached the household. Shakespeare himself is never named in the text, referred to only through his roles, the tutor, the husband, the father.

The case for reading it

Everything about the book's structure argues for the page. Two timelines run side by side, and while reviewers praise how fluently O'Farrell moves between them, a reader retains the ability to pause and check exactly where a chapter sits in time, something the page allows far more naturally than a single continuous audio listen. The narration itself shifts between several points of view, chiefly Agnes and, within the 1596 strand, Hamnet, with more distanced passages describing the household besides, and a standalone chapter drops both character threads altogether to trace the plague's route to Stratford, a structural interruption that lands with more precision when a reader can see it announced as its own chapter. Beyond structure, the prose itself is the clearest case of all. Critics describe it as lyrical, dense with sensory period detail, and written in an unusual continuous present tense that has been compared to Hilary Mantel's work, exactly the kind of writing that rewards slowing down and rereading a sentence rather than letting it pass by.

The case for listening to it

The case for audio rests almost entirely on the fact that a single narrator carries the whole book in either available edition, so there is no shifting cast of voices to keep straight, and two distinct performances exist to choose from. The original 2020 recording, narrated by Ell Potter, runs 12 hours 42 minutes. A newer 2025 edition, timed to the film's release, is narrated by Jessie Buckley, the film's own lead actress, and runs 12 hours 56 minutes. For a listener who specifically wants to hear Buckley's voice after seeing her Academy Award-winning performance on screen, that edition offers something the page cannot. Beyond that specific appeal, though, the book's interleaved timelines and standalone digression chapter are the kind of structural devices that tend to disorient a listener more than a reader, since there is no way to glance back and confirm which strand a chapter belongs to mid-listen.

The audiobook in detail

Two single-narrator, unabridged productions exist. The original, from Penguin Random House Audio, was narrated by Ell Potter and released in July 2020 alongside the US print edition, running 12 hours 42 minutes. A second edition, narrated by Jessie Buckley and released by Headline in May 2025 to coincide with the film, runs 12 hours 56 minutes. Both are straightforward narrated readings with no confirmed sound design or multi-voice casting. The choice between them is really a choice of performer, Potter's original interpretation against Buckley's, made after starring in the film adaptation herself.

Who should ignore this verdict

Listeners who specifically want to hear Jessie Buckley's performance after watching her Academy Award-winning turn in the film, or anyone who simply prefers listening and is not troubled by dual timelines, will still get a well-made recording either way. For most readers, though, the two interleaved timelines, several points of view, and prose built to be lingered over make this a book better suited to the page.

Related verdicts

Questions people ask